Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Pappas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:24, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Nicholas Pappas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet notability requirements Kumioko (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete No indication of importance. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a general and the Legion of Merit is not a high enough honour to justify automatic inclusion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILBIO and WP:OUTCOMES. Officers below the rank of major general or rear admiral are rarely automatically notable, and there is no such allegation of notability here.  Sometimes, a brigadier general can be notable if he had independent notability, for example Zachary Taylor, Noel F. Parrish, Frank E. Petersen, or Sherian Cadoria; likewise, a "first" for a major could be notable (e.g, Shawna Rochelle Kimbrell).  If he had a notable relative, we could merge his bio into theirs, cf. Roderick Wetherill, Jr.. Bearian (talk) 18:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * In actual fact, under WP:SOLDIER all general and flag officers are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.