Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Sand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Issue raised by the nominator has been addressed now. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 17:30, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Nicholas Sand

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:BLPSOURCES--There are none. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. It certainly needs to be edited for neutrality. Phrases such as "low-profile hero" don't really reflect the encyclopedic style that we need and require on here. I'll see what sources I can find.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's still things in the articles that need to be sourced and we still need to edit the article for neutrality, but I've found mentions of him in multiple sources. He seems to barely squeak by notability guidelines.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. With Tokyogirl's work, I will say keep, as it at least is looking like an encyclopedia article now. Gtwfan52 (talk) 14:43, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. An interesting article about one of the major LSD chemists of the '60s. Keristrasza (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep and close - The article is now a unsourced BLP; it has nine sources in it at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks to all involved. Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.