Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Wilks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Nicholas Wilks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Insufficient secondary source coverage. Sources provided are unreliable or primary. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  21:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are very unreliable. Sun  Country Guy 01  23:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources given are either primary, not independent or the subject, or do not give significant enough coverage of the person. As for sources outside the article, there appear to be none which suggest he has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself. Since he doesn't fall into any of the other categories at WP:MUSICBIO, and does not qualify for WP:TEACHER because he is not a professor or major research figure, although he may be head of music at a school, unfortunately he fails to meet notability guidelines. Jay  Σεβαστός discuss  15:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.