Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Wooldridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas Wooldridge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnotable attorney. No signs of notability, or even a claim of notability. Single article about opposition to death penalty in the daily kos does not establish notability. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  23:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * He seems to have been in the news quite a bit, though I wouldn't go citing the Daily Mail or anything. My main reservation is he seems to be notable for defending people charged with terrorism offences and it might simply be we can't write an article about him without falling foul of WP:BLPCRIME. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  23:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete having high profile clients is not generally enough to make a lawyer notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.