Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas anthony denmon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Nicholas anthony denmon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NAUTHOR. He blogs at HuffPo and his bio is the only place I found on the web that discusses him. J bh Talk  15:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  15:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There do not appear to be any public, independent, in-depth sources about this writer (rather than by him). Therefore, he fails our notability standards. I remind the gentle reader that we are not a webhost for authors' publicity purposes. Bearian (talk) 20:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is in fact actually speedy material since the "best known" claims are certainly questionable and give no actual substance for an article, everything else listed is entirely trivial. SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.