Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nichole Rhodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Nichole Rhodes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any secondary sources for this person. Her name pops up in things like General Motors press releases as being a contact, but I am unable to find any sources that would aid her in passing WP:BIO. Sixtysixstar (talk) 21:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought BLPs required at least one secondary source otherwise they are speedied, or have I picked that up wrong? Quantpole (talk) 00:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * They don't need any sources at all as long there is some assertion of notability (but I think what you said is a really neat idea). This article was tagged db-A7 three minutes after it was created. The speedy was declined as there are lots of assertions, but, as far as I can tell, none of them are significant enough to generate secondary commentary. Sixtysixstar (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Copyright violation, most of text of the Career section along with the photo is copied from http://www.therhodesglobalgroup.com/The_Rhodes_Global_Group/Nichole_Rhodes__.html  Not-notable, can not find any reliable sources to verify the claims of notability in the article. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio and having unsourcable assertions, thus violating WP:BLP.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Sixtysixsatr--I can't find any independent, secondary sources either. Yilloslime T C  16:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.