Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NickCentral (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

NickCentral (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a prayer of meeting WP:GNG. The only provided source appears to be a page on the personal website of one of the website's designers, which barely has any information about the subject other than a few screenshots and a brief descriptive paragraph. Per the article, the website is private, because it has to access the website you must work or having relations with Nickelodeon, Viacom or MTV which all but guarantees that this will never be covered by independent reliable sources. The disambiguator also appears to be wrong (it's a website, not a company), but that's neither here nor there. signed,Rosguill talk 21:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Probably qualifies for WP:A7.  Had  simply moved this into mainspace, I would suggest treating it as a novice mis-step and just moving it back to draft.  But, the history of this shows a combative tendency, and possibly a sock.  This edit comment ("we have improved the page...") makes me believe they're working as part of a promotional team, or at best, WP:COI/WP:UPE so I'm not really inclined to cut them any slack.  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A7 CodeLyoko  buzz  00:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD and 's comments, with which I completely agree. That the website is not accessible to anyone who isn't an employee of Viacom or one of its external partners makes the possibility of paid editing strong. Note that AlbForLife4 posted to this AfD's talk page but I'm not convinced by his reasons for not supplying references. Regarding the nom's comment that The disambiguator also appears to be wrong (it's a website, not a company), I agree it's a minor issue but I should point out that the article was originally at NickCentral (website) and was moved to . -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 06:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment In the event that this article is deleted, Nick Central (disambiguation) should probably be deleted as well. It was created only as a result of this article being moved to mainspace and will only have one entry after deletion. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 07:54, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.