Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Berg conspiracy theories (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, merge/redirect can be discussed and/or done by those interested. W.marsh 04:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Nick Berg conspiracy theories
Delete Unencyclopedic speculation - unverifiable San Saba 19:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete This article consists entirely of original research and random speculation and reads more like paranoid ranting than an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is a place for facts, not unsupported fantasizing. Indrian 19:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

There was rampant speculation but unless it can be sourced, Delete --Mmx1 23:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep - This article is rather noteworthy, I believe that it should be kept, but more links and sources should be available in the article for verification. It's a fascinating article, actually. - XX55XX 02:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect and possibly merge stuff that is sourced/verified to Nick Berg MLA 10:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge after clean up, as per MLA. Shawnc 01:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Needs to be cleaned up, but this should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.195.234.26 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.