Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Blakey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Nick Blakey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has not played a game yet, does not meet WP:NAFL Screech1616 (talk) 12:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify clearly WP:TOOSOON for an article, but is a high draft pick and likely to debut in the upcoming season. No harm keeping this as a draft. On the other hand, it's a very short article that could easily be recreated if Blakey debuts, so I'm not opposed to deletion. – Teratix ₵ 12:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Draftify will almost certainly be notable, but doesn't quite pass WP:GNG or WP:NAFL yet. SportingFlyer  talk  15:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify is fine, although notability WP:GNG is debatable given the media coverage (radio, tv, print and web) of the individual over the past 18 months and the coverage leading up to the draft. Agree that article doesn't meet WP:NAFL Jmitchell38488 (talk) 00:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to List of Sydney Swans players. Valid search term, why hide it completely? The-Pope (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * that's a more useful solution for the majority of players that haven't played a game yet, to redirect to that search result Jmitchell38488 (talk) 03:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy Generally I oppose userfying a BLP but, since the subject will so soon meet inherent notability, this seems to be an okay exception. Chetsford (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.