Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Cherukuri (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Nick Cherukuri
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Akevsharma (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Akevsharma (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep As founder and CEO of a notable company, received significant coverage such as, , , , ,, and Forbes links. Meets WP:GNG.  —Natalie  Ricci Natalie 10:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete All are PR puff pieces. In particular, #5 above is a Soundcloud interview and #10 is a Forbes contributor site. The rest look about as useless for sources. I find nothing we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE his being a CEO might be a consideration if the company ThirdEye Gen was a Fortune 500 company, but that is absolutely not the case, so his being a CEO does not suggest notability in any way. As for the references in the article, I went through each of the references and have created a source assessment table at Talk:Nick Cherukuri. Basically what it boils down to is that there's a lot of trivial coverage and a couple of interviews and the odd press release, but nothing that contributes to WP:GNG in any way. Searching online found more of the same. The sources above by User:NatalieRci are more of the same: an interview, a press release, trivial coverage, trivial coverage, trivial coverage, trivial coverage (and WP:FORBESCON), and another press release. None of those contribute to notability per WP:GNG. - Aoidh (talk) 01:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, none of the given sources are really useful. — VersaceSpace  🌃 03:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Aoidh's source analysis.-KH-1 (talk) 05:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.