Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Cousins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Nick Cousins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This player fails WP:NHOCKEY. The only reliable, third-party coverage of him I can find is in relation to his trial for sexual assault (of which he was acquitted). This doesn't make him eligible for inclusion per WP:CRIME. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 17:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (articulate)  @ 15:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete He doesn't meet WP:NHOCKEY and I don't believe he meets WP:GNG. The sports coverage is routine and I don't think the sexual assault coverage is enough (and I think it might fall under WP:BLP1E).Jakejr (talk) 03:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete He is not notable under WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Deadman137 (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.