Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Cross


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Nick Cross

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable animator; references are links to articles about projects he worked on, not really about him Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  15:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 16:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The first four references are exclusively about Nick Cross... IsaacAA (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  13:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article seems to be in good standing regarding WP:GNG, it has five secondary sources about the topic: four interviews (regional magazine, industry magazine, indie magazine, trade organization) and one entertainment TV show cover the topic. Googling for interview gives at least five more interviews that have yet to be incorporated in the article, including one published in the book Canadian Animation (Chris Robinson, 2008). There doesn't seem to be any doubt regarding notability. IsaacAA (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per IsaacAA's reasoning. --Jpcase (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.