Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Dyer-Witheford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 23:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Nick Dyer-Witheford

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

unclear notability with no references or citations to support any infomation in the article GlassFET 21:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No references, no assertion of notability.  Dooms  Day349  21:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, no assertion of notability & looks to fail prof test.  tomasz.  09:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete, but Revise, he is a fairly important part of the project of a post-structuralist reconsideration of anarchism and marxism. I would remind you all that we do have Richard JF Day on Wikipedia, and that he is of similar importance.  The project of Dyer-Witheford is also particularly important from the perspective of Wikipedia, since it part it deals with the struggle against capitalism on the Internet.  I do agree that this article needs to be greatly revised, possibly by adding the philosopher box and a summary of his book and other parts of his thought. 66.102.80.219 15:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)  But what do you mean  by assertion of notability?  How about: http://affinityproject.org/theories/dyerwitheford.html? 66.102.80.219 02:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no assertion of notability, no third party sources and he can struggle against capitalism on the internet somewhere else. Nick mallory 16:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.