Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Garrett Development, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 12:44, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Nick Garrett Development, Inc.
Does not seem to meet notability standards set out in Notability (companies and corporations). No references or sources provided, and no readily meaningful Google results appear. -- PeruvianLlama(spit) 22:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - see also Articles for deletion/Charles Nick Garrett, Jr.. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 22:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Reply - This article was my first shot at creating a Wiki entry. I have added a number of links to articles about NGDI or on topics which refer to the company directly.  As I have stated, this is a company which gained its reputation without the use of the internet.  Although, they have been in business for 25 years, there was not a website devoted to the organization until 2005. Consequently NGDI has not left a very substantial footprint on the web and searching only returns minor entries several pages into the results.  Because of numerous stories devoted to the organization in local and regional newspapers and magazines, I believe Nick Garrett Development, Inc., and the subsequent bio of its CEO Charles Nick Garrett, Jr. meet the criteria of Notability (companies and corporations).  It is also important to note that Wikipedia's Notability guideline is not a policy, and what may be notable to me, could mean nothing to another.Yater 19:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Reserved I encourage User:Yater 77@yahoo.com to read the Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) and proceed from there and consider requesting a user name move to something more manageable - User:Yater is available, for example. --Alf melmac 23:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not appear to be notable. Userfication is also allowed. Stifle 09:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.