Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Grant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Seraphim&hearts; Whipp  16:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Nick Grant

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable individual, unsourced claims of 52 wins with no losses Sherdog has nothing so unlikely, 1 source, that he has a brother... Nate1481(t/c) 09:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.   -- Nate1481(t/c) 09:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   -- Nate1481(t/c) 09:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as the one reference doesn't even mention any "Grant". Morenoodles (talk) 10:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to fail WP:BIO/WP:ATHLETE, but really there doesn't seem to be anything out there about this fellow. Plus all the info on MMA in the article got reverted. I'd go so far as to say there isn't even an assertion of notability in there anymore, probably green-lighting it for WP:CSD. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 11:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I removed the info after I nominated it. 52-0 is a HUGE claim without even a dodgy home page as a source feel free to A7 it if you think it qualifies. --Nate1481(t/c) 12:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: The chances are some guy (called Nick Grant) came along and decided to make a false article about themselves.  Assuming good faith, it may be that it's real but not notable.  Therefore it's a non-notable possible hoax article...... Densock  .. Talk (Dendodge on a public network) 11:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence this individual exists. JJL (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a Nick Grant who competes in MMA possibly as a lightweight, but he isn't notable. gnfnrf (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.