Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Harmon (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Nick Harmon
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I can find no evidence that Harmon has ever won a significant award.  There is the slightest of arguments to be made that he "has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre … such as beginning a trend in pornography", in that his work in creating "custom gay fetish video" is unique, but I can't think of how to do the research to demonstrate that he is indeed a pioneer and I'm not sure if this meets that aspect of WP:PORNBIO.  He was reasonably well-known in his field in the 80s but this seems not to have translated into lasting notability.  Ubelowme (talk) 20:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article is not supported by any reliable sources and contains no legitimate assertions of notability. The previous AFD was disrupted by editors engaging in WP:POINTY defiance of BLP policies. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.