Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Henderson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 01:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Nick Henderson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly non-notable person; references listed aren't about the subject, they just essentially mention that he exists. I've tried to find something else, but I'm struggling because of how common the name is. fuzzy510 (talk) 05:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete immediately. notability. shamelessness. perversion. please. now. delete this. don't wait. this is silly. delete. delete. delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usernamism (talk • contribs) 05:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 00:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep moderate presence on gsearch, little on news . JJL (talk) 00:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep He's quite notable and well covered. - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 01:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Have to agree with the nominator here, that what's available as sources don't quite amount to "significant coverage." He's just mentioned here and there in the context of larger topics from what it looks like.    Mbinebri   talk &larr; 01:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.