Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Jeffery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Nick Jeffery

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 21:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 21:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Middle ranking businessman. Nothing special about him, nothing notable. All the references do is show that he worked for these companies, not that he did anything out-of-the-ordinary or spectacular to gain him notability. Biker Biker (talk) 20:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak weak keep Not a high profile individual but he's CEO of a Vodafone branch Could he be a future company CEO or is this WP:CB territory? Its hard to say. But the key question is whether his current position gives him a bit more notability in the businessworld? Maybe it does. I can't say. --Artene50 (talk) 23:48, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. The idea that he "could be a future company CEO" violates the no crystal balling policy. Dr.Who (talk) 07:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per WP:ANYBIO. Person is not known outside business community, so kinda WP:ONEEVENT. -- →gab  24 dot  grab← 16:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.