Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Loeb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 17:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Nick Loeb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Loeb seems to have had a few occupations; he's dabbled in film, politics, and most recently business. He has received a lot of secondary coverage, but almost all of it is gossip-mag sort of stuff centred around his relationship with Sofia Vergara. Notability is not inherited by being involved with someone famous, and I'm not able to find a single substantial source about Loeb that doesn't prominently have to remind the reader that he's Vergara's fiancé. I do not believe given this that Loeb meets the WP:BIO notability criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete One of the his more serious reported contributions regarding Carbon Solutions America comes directly from his personal website, which he likely wrote. The validity and importance of such a claim are thus a bit dubious  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.95.170.168 (talk) 04:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

— Michelchann44 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * Keep notability established by several career and personal accomplishments covered by reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I think notability is clearly established by several reliable independent sources. He's made semi-notable films himself, and he appears to be notable enough that reputable news organizations follow aspects of his life.  He's also dabbled in the American political scene.  This is a strong keep for me.Michelchann44 (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment, I have reformatted some comments in this discussion for ease of reading. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.