Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Magyar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SpinningSpark 09:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Nick Magyar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN teenage hockey player who fails WP:NHOCKEY. No reliable sources attesting to the player's notability as per the GNG, and a search for the same on Highbeam turned up not even routine sports coverage (which would be debarred by WP:ROUTINE). PROD was removed by article creator without comment, said creator being a SPA for whom this article is his sole Wikipedia activity.   Ravenswing   20:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. I found a few articles about him that are more than routine sports coverage (1, 2, 3, 4). It's not a lot but I think it's enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hockey notability should be for 1st-round NHL draft picks. The articles cited by Tchaliburton are about his prepping for the draft where he just achieved 4th round therefore insufficient for notability. Canuckle (talk) 23:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't restricted to first round draft picks and the articles aren't just about the draft. A player who meets WP:GNG is notable. I believe he is notable based on these references, but just barely. Tchaliburton (talk) 00:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * respectfully disagree. coverage does not seem significant. 3 of 4 articles headlined about the draft and fourth mentions it. I have authored and supported WP:GNG for bios of non-NHL players but where significance is more than just a draft or performing on junior hockey teamCanuckle (talk) 01:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Changing my input to delete. I don't think there's the depth of coverage for WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 02:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Jakejr (talk) 05:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.