Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Miller (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no reliable sources at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Nick Miller (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Notable at all... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickmillernz (talk • contribs) 14 April 2014
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. gadfium 22:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gadfium 22:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


 * delete - LOL, I agree with you Nick Miller....--Stemoc (talk) 23:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep Subject with the same name deleting an article with their name; they are advised to read our conflict of interest policies. Nothing wrong with the article as-is and no negative assertions are being made here.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:44, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Regardless of the name of the nominator, the actor does fail notability, not sure how the article survived so many years..I know a few more "recurring" Shortland Street actors whose articles were deleted as they were not regarded as "notable"..--Stemoc (talk) 23:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Well... it's not really a clear cut case of "not notable" since he seems to have been a fairly major character in the third series of The Tribe, and was part of the show for 3 years. It seems to be what he's mostly known for, but then he was also a minor character in another series. We might be able to redirect this to Tribe, if the consensus is to delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 *  Keep  Subject meets WP:NACTOR. The article is in bad need of RS references though and I have tagged it accordingly. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to Delete on grounds of WP:NRV fail. All claims to notability MUST be backed by RS sources. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment The claim that an editor named Nick Miller must be this one is the most ludrcrous claim I have ever seen. Miller is a very, very common last name, and Nick a very common first name. What next, will I be excluded from any discussion on all the articles on John Lambert because it is a conflict of interest?John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment No I am not Nick Miller myself but I do feel this Article is non-notable. Please sort yourselves out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickmillernz (talk • contribs) 21:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:27, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NACTORS. Has not had significant roles in multiple notable...television shows; does not have a large fan base/following; appears to not have been featured multiple times in mainstream media. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.