Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Palumbo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. AmiDaniel (talk) 23:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Nick Palumbo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete.For one thing, the article is entirely non-objective. I removed some superfluous fluff, but the whole article reads like a promotional piece. Nothing about the mass criticism his films have received, the questionable content such as using a real infant in one scene, or allegations of anti-semitism...nada. A lot of the information is unsourced as well.

I also don't think he's that notable, at least for an encyclopedia. No one outside the core horror community knows about his work, and a lot of the 'controversy' that his films have received usually stem from his own aggressive message board patrolling.

No categories and no links. He was actually listed on a list of notable horror film directors, but he is clearly not and I removed it. CyberGhostface 18:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

KEEP The article has been ammended with additional information. Disinformation has been repeatedly added to the article including the claim that the film was produced by Thrid Reich Productions when in fact it was produced by Fright Flix Productions. S_noone
 * Keep. The IMDb listing and the interviews are enough to demonstrate notability. I added categories. The article would benefit if someone could add information relating to the points that CyberGhostface has raised. --Eastmain 19:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep needs cleanup, not delete. Madmedea 21:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I see some problems with WP:V but the subject of the article is notable. The article itself needs work Alf photoman 22:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, Nick (because we all know thats who you are) I'll remove the bit about Third Reich as I can't find a source. But you're not removing the cited information that shows you in a less than favorable light. This is an encyclopedia article, not a fluff piece you use to shill your films.--CyberGhostface 02:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.