Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Parker (producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Nick Parker (producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An internet personality and music producer fails to pass WP:GNG can't find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to support WP:NBIO. GSS (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - we almost always delete articles about producers because they are so common as to be run of the mill. That this is an up-and-coming young person who is 18 years old, before he has yet to accomplish much, is even more of an argument to delete what is essentially a teenager's web page. Sorry, kid. Bearian (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has improved since it's initial creation and now includes more verifiable sources. The career section which includes similar artists who are already present on Wikipedia are equally or less accomplished. For such a genre you can't expect Times coverage but there's enough coverage from reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemoonnight (talk • contribs) 18:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * — Bluemoonnight (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Comment Added more sources, he does more than just producing music and for the music style he works with there's enough accomplishment references included in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A59x (talk • contribs) 02:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry mate the subject still fails so meet the requirements and having profile on ESPN doesn't make someone notable it must satisfy WP:NSPORT. GSS (talk) 04:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment The music genre is already small it's not rap it's not rock or pop so you can't expect MTV coverage, the artist in discussion is notable enough in his field as per Google search. The submitted links are as good as any coverage an artist that produces trance music could ever get especially at that young age. The best part about Wikipedia is that it's not static encyclopedia and it can always be updated. The article fits if not average at least the minimum requirements to pass as relevant especially that there are articles with less relevannce in terms of references that are already active here and been that way for years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A59x (talk • contribs) 09:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Google search result showing nothing to support the notability rather than some unreliable and user generated sources which are not acceptable. GSS (talk) 09:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Reliability relevance ratio is per field, we're not on the same page here, you're expecting MTV coverage for a Trance artist which is impossible. --A59x (talk) 09:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.