Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Nick Pino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobiography in which notability is not established. The only two sources included are not independent and do not provide any in-depth coverage. It fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:AUTOBIO, not enough coverage in third-party sources to meet WP:AUTHOR. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: these are the only third-party sources I could find: 1 and 2. They're both inadequate.
 * ...is just him and another commentator speculating about one video-game, he isn't the primary topic of the video.
 * ...is a compilation of reviews, one of which he features in, again, not the primary topic and no indication that he is well-known as a reliable reviewer.
 * Aside from the notability problem, we've got a verifiability issue. I've blanked the personal life section because it was completely unreferenced.
 *  Dr Strauss   talk   11:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: The sources are not independent and don't provide enough coverage to pass the general notability guidelines. As such, the article does not meet WP:AUTHOR. RetiredDuke  14:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.