Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Poullos

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy deleted. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:03, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nick Poullos
Not sure if this is actually speediable, so I'm bringing it here. Vanity, unverifiable. Author has previously removed cleanup-importance tag. -- Jonel | Speak 00:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, possible speedy as newbie test or for lack of context. Kappa 01:00, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 01:36, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a clear speedy. -Splash 01:41, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * ’’’STRONG speedy delete’’’ – Qualifies for speedy under “General” 1 and possibly 2; “Articles” 1 (PERFECT example, better than the one that actually appears on the Speedy deletion page. Kevin Wells 01:42, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy it. Is there an admin in the house? -R. fiend 01:47, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted by me. It was a vandalism article.  Criteria, if they're really needed, would include, but not be limited to, direct address, short with no content, and libel. Geogre 01:59, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .