Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Remy Matthews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 13:39, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nick Remy Matthews

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Also google Nick Matthews cinematograph -wikipedia -->
 * Also google Nick Matthews cinematograph -wikipedia -->

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and. Run-of-the-mill person. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:12, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:13, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep There is a lot of bits and pieces but not anything specifically in-depth IRS.  However, the subject's films have been extensively reviewed by reliable sources and internationally, and the subject has won a few awards.  There seems to me to be sustained and broad coverage of the subject even if there are no single standout sources, and sufficient to support a detailed article.  There are better sources than most of those in the current article.  Aoziwe (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:Creative as above with cinematography in multiple notable feature films and has a number of awards, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:Creative WP:GNG  Lubbad85   (<b style="color:#060">☎</b>) 14:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - With the subjects films having won awards, i'd say this passes WP:CREATIVE. --  Dane <b style="color: #00AC1D;">talk </b> 04:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:ANYBIO, and WP:CREATIVE. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep since subject meets WP:NCREATIVE. -The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.