Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Steitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Nick Steitz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject of the article does not appear to be notable. It appears he was a practice squad member of a few teams in the NFL. He may have played 1 year in an arena league but I can't find a reliable source to back that up. Rockfang (talk) 06:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment It appears he never played a regular or postseason game in the NFL.--Rockfang (talk) 06:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. I did some research and couldn't find anything. He's never played an NFL game and I cant find information about his arena football career. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTSPERSON.
 * RealPharmer3 (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * He did play in the arena league but that no longer gives automatic notability. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Played in the arena league (as a starter, too), named to the Oregon football all-decade team and does appear to have some sigcov, see: Center Of Attention (p2) from The Modesto Bee; Former Los Banos star hopes to stick with 49ers (p2) from the same; A cut above the rest from the Merced Sun-Star (full-page); Where Are They Now? Giesel And Steitz (p2) from the same (although it was originally published in The Los Banos Enterprise); and New kids on the block (p2) from the same. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * . BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football,  and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Per BeanieFan. The article at the time of nomination was an unsourced bio of a living person, raising BLP concerns and understandably triggering an AfD. The sources linked by Beanie show that there is SIGCOV sufficient to pass GNG, and one of those sources has no been added to the article. Cbl62 (talk) 20:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can’t find any evidence of notability that would meet NATHLETE. Serratra (talk) 04:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You can't say "delete per NATHLETE" when its impossible for this kind of athlete to meet it! BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Whether he played in an NFL game or not, doesn't have too much relevance. BeanieFan11's sources provide enough notability meeting WP:BASIC. JojoMN1987 (talk) 15:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - failing NATHLETE is irrelevant for a subject that meets GNG. Rlendog (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG per sources found by BeanieFan11. Alvaldi (talk) 10:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG per Beanie's sources. L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 16:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG based on new sources found.--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per the three sources provided. DJ Cane (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.