Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick T. Thomopoulos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 21:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Nick T. Thomopoulos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional biography created by the comms department of his employer. Spam. Guy (Help!) 19:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability aside, WP:TNT applies here. This reads more like a puff piece than an encyclopedia article. ƒirefly  ( t · c · who? ) 20:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Some high cites on GS but too few as yet. Fails WP:Prof as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC).
 * I do not have an opinion on the subject's notability at this point but this is not a WP:Too soon case, as the article says that he is a retired professor emeritus who was active in 1970s and 1980s. (In fact, according to this, it appears that he died in December 2017; the photo there matches that in his faculty profile page ). If he is not notable already, he won't become notable in the future. Nsk92 (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Agree with Nsk92, above. -The Gnome (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. The claims of notability seem to rest on his many books. But although a couple of them have strong citation numbers, most don't, and I could only find one review of one of them (lukewarm at best, although I don't think that's especially relevant). I don't think that's enough for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF, nor enough to overcome the promotional creation of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF, WP:N and WP:GNG.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.