Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Tolhurst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 22:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Nick Tolhurst

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable academic, coverage in sources is insufficient to warrant an article. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 03:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 03:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough yet on GS, GB, GN. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete - I didn't see any notable links on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister  talk  04:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find adequate non-academic coverage of his books to pass WP:AUTHOR, and the article doesn't present any evidence that he passes WP:PROF either. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.