Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Velasquez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Appears to be a promotional article Joyous! | Talk 21:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Nick Velasquez

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional bio of a non-notable author sourced to unreliable 'contributor' articles and sponsored posts - the article actually boasts about how he writes for these sorts of dodgy outlets like Thrive Global and Forbes contributors...  are contributor articles,  is a sponsored post ("WRITTEN IN PARTNERSHIP WITH BUSINESS LEADERSHIP NETWORK"),  is a sponsored post (from "PR Spot"), this is a random wordpress blog, etc. Simply not encyclopedically relevant in any sense. Spicy (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and Colombia. Shellwood (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Always off to a good start when the photo in the article is a copyvio, and used here . That's about the only semi-RS I can find. This fellow is a long way from GNG and I'd think this was some sort of promotion or SEO article. Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Considering the creator said "Hope Wikipedia will get him the attention" it's obviously promotional. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete He's also apparently a personal trainer...WP:RESUME article for someone who is only doing that and not the actual work which should be part of a resume.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - Relatively new to Wikipedia and would appreciate if specific pointers were provided that would align this article with the guidelines of Wikipedia. For the image used, if it's an issue, I'll remove it. Other than that, the article appears self-explanatory. Naomikrate (talk) 11:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I reverted an inappropriate draftification of the article. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is spam. And it would have been G5'd anyway. MarioGom (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to have mostly written via pay-to-publish programs and doesn't pass WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG  -- Devoke  water  12:32, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.