Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Vujicic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  {L} 16:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Nick Vujicic


Non-notable; There are no sources refering to him or his work other than his own website John Reaves 07:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - Well I do know that it is menat for Deletion. If it can be edited and put it would look more neat.rencin24
 * Keep and re-write, I'm doing it now. It's mainly the way the article's set out, he's plenty notable enough.  Cat tleG irl  '' talk 08:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It I feel this guy has not written it properly will do the necessary edits.58.2.238.143 08:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment have been re-writing the article, and google searches note a number of relevant hits, who's information will soon be put into the article. His own website does have a useful biographical section on him, though, and that is why it is listed.  Cat tleG irl  '' talk 08:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete- reads like spam. Pete Fenelon 02:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep it It has got a number of relavent links and the page does look now more better than before.ON FIRE


 * Keep it – he seems notable enough and the article is well organized, although I don't see the point of the "Notable Figures" section. I do admire that he (or somebody) added his name last to the speaker list in Motivational speaker.  --CliffC 15:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * CommentsI did add his name to the motivational speaker. Because he is quite notable and as his profession is a "speaker". If anyone feels that it is not right then you can take it.But it does not make any difference.rencin24
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.