Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon vs Cartoon Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  - Early closure - Snowball, seconded with both a Speedy and a Strong. Marasmusine (talk) 10:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Nickelodeon vs Cartoon Network

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'd tag this as a hoax, but I'm not 100% positive. For starters, the game is supposedly a "collaboration between Hanna-Babera (sic)", but Hanna-Barbera simply does not exist past 2001. Also, a google search shows me this site, which appears to be where fans concoct fictitious boxarts. Finally, there is no publisher listed, so even if the game is not a hoax, it would simply be WP:CRYSTAL Yngvarr (t) (c) 09:30, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete We've knocked down many of these articles, and this is no different at all. A complete hoax involving impossible corporate hurdles to get over and if there are any sources, they're all red herrings. I'd support a G3 tag.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 09:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll add a G3 tag, but leave the AFD up; reviewing admin can make their own judgement. Yngvarr (t) (c) 09:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. —Ost (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Well, I don't know that it qualifies under G3 as a "blatant hoax" - I'm wary through reading WP:HOAX - but I personally would consider it such.  Do away with it! ~ Amory (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete. I agree it doesn't qualify for a speedy, but really, is there any chance this article won't be deleted at the end of this AfD?  No.  Powers T 16:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not really a "blatant hoax", but not notable, either. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 16:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It's pretty obvious that this is a hoax and does not exist. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 16:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Another one of these hoaxes? Someone needs their connection taken away from them. treelo  radda  09:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, the speedy G3 was declined for this article. --Taelus (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. --Taelus (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.