Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Hoberman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Nicky Hoberman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:ARTIST. Sources merely confirm her work was exhibited. LibStar (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and South Africa. LibStar (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a stub, and is pretty well sourced as such. She appears to have exhibited in numerous locations, with a lot to sources to those sites. The sources focus on her art, which is why she's notable. We don't necessarily need to know an artist's background and personal life, just about her output. — Maile (talk) 11:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - The sources demonstrate her notability. The article is could do with more information but even as a stub it is still notable.DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment The article's main source is a dead link from a gallery database https://www.whitfordfineart.com/artist/biography/307/nicky_hoberman. Another main link is the artist's website. However there are reliable sources at ArtUK and the Brooklyn Museum. I cannot tell if her art is actually in the collection of the Brooklyn Museum or if she is just listed in their feminist database. I don't see a way to expand the article and the current sourcing is bad. Leaning towards delete, unless there is sourcing to show that her work is in a collection or notable. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - I still can't figure out if she is in the Brooklyn Museum, but citations of in depth reviews of solo shows added to the article. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.