Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Ioannou


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Nicky Ioannou

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Played part of 2 matches in the 4th tier of England before seemingly disappearing from the public eye. WP:NFOOTBALL no longer exists so Ioannou needs to meet WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC to have an article. No hits in Google News, ProQuest or the British Newspaper Archive which casts some doubt on whether the significant coverage in multiple independent sources exists. Since there is not yet a list of all Barnet FC players, I'm not seeing any appropriate WP:ATD at this moment in time. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Cyprus,  and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Probably delete I know Nicky, played with him years ago, the bio is missing two non-league clubs, but ye, not really enough for GNG. Regards. Govvy (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 17:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - A couple of appearances at the lowest level of English League football own there own are not enough to make someone notable. Equally a non-league career in itself is also generally not going to be enough to make a subject notable enough for an article. As far as I can see there is nothing else (such as significant coverage) that would suggest any other ground for notability then this is a fairly clear case. Dunarc (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.