Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Fazio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Nico Fazio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources all self-published, doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC Seems to be WP:PROMO, unable to find additional WP:RS &#8213;  Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 18:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * See also Articles for deletion/Nico Fazio production discography, pending separately. postdlf (talk) 20:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The author's creator has been repeatedly trying to remove the AfD template from the page. A protection request has been made (here) &#8213; Padenton &#124;&#9993;  18:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is under semi-protection status, expires 18:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)) &#8213; Padenton &#124;&#9993;  18:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (talk)  @ 20:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Even when I went to the site listed as a reference and checked out the links in the press section it was hard to say any of them were good, one had no author listed, one did not link to the article it quoted, and one ...might have been good but one source is not enough to make this article. There doesn't seem to be any reason to have this page on wikipedia other than to promote the individual.Peachywink (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm not sure whether WP:CREATIVE is the right place to judge this, but I don't see that he meets either that or the WP:GNG. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.