Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Parker (child actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Nico Parker (child actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has only appeared in one notable film. Fails WP:ENT. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   12:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk   12:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk   12:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: possibly a WP:TOOSOON. She still has to gain significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:BIO. Ceethekreator (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete and stop making articles like this for God’s sake. She’s a child. Trillfendi (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Could be WP:TOOSOON, but the main issue is that it fails WP:NACTOR. She only contributed majorly in one notable show, which is Dumbo.  I Need Support   :3 03:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the arguments above. At the moment she would not seem to meet notability requirements. It may well be that this will change in the future, and at such a time an article could be created, but this does not alter the fact that at the moment an article is premature. Dunarc (talk) 22:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.