Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This particular discussion is going nowhere; anyone who is not a sock may feel free to renominate. Drmies (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nicolás Atanes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. Citterz (talk) 16:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Update Nom: UnNotable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. (I forget to add UN to avoid confusion) Citterz (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Citterz (talk) 16:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Citterz Sorry but this is not sufficiently explained which policy the subject does fail of - looks more like your personal opinion. Further it seems that you did not any BEFORE search at all. Please make yourself comfortable with the AfD process. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Just a typo mistake. I did WP:BEFORE clear and concise. Citterz (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

He's famous in Spain: many newspapers has covered his way, and he has appeared on TV magazines, too.. Please, don't remove him — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remitbuber (talk • contribs) Can you first clear your COI? Please explain what connection you do have with this person?
 * Comment. What exactly is the nominator's rationale for suggesting that the article be deleted? "Notable mathematical activist" sounds like a reason to keep the article, not to delete it. Nsk92 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SK as the nominator has not advanced any argument for deletion or redirection. If the article should be deleted then a discussion should be started with a proper rationale. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: per WP:SK#1 CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Keep, per WP:SK, as it is still unclear why we are here and why the article was nominated for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Since an updated nomination rationale has been provided, SK#1 probably no longer applies, although I am unsure to what extent we are supposed to entertain an AfD nomination from a confirmed sock. In any case, as MarkH21 notes below, the subject satisfies WP:GNG and WP:BIO for his social activism. Apart from sources mentioned by MarkH21, there are others, e.g. and . Nsk92 (talk) 11:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Bogus nomination. MarioGom (talk) 13:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. The first editor (Remitbuber) and the IP 90.167.181.254 are creating this biography in several languages and linking it in general articles like es:Matemáticas or es:Activismo, a clear case of cross-wiki spam. It has been deleted two times on es.wiki already. -sasha- (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Update Nom: UnNotable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. (I forget to add UN to avoid confusion) Citterz (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: SK#1 is no longer valid with the later clarification by the nominator, but the nominator was later blocked and therefore should be discounted anyways. Independent of the validity of speedy keep criteria, the subject probably passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in Noticias de Navarra, El Mundo, and Diario Vasco. — MarkH21talk 01:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. WP:SUSTAINED Weburbia (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Whatever do you mean, "brief"? We already have examples of in-depth coverage from February 2020, July 2020, August 2020, December 2020, December 2020, and April 2021, spanning over a year. That's plenty WP:SUSTAINED, especially for the subject who is just 16 years old himself. Nsk92 (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: It turns out that the article creator changed the nomination text early on in, which is what led to this whole hullabaloo (in addition to the nominator being a sock, of course). — MarkH21talk 20:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.