Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Córdoba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Nicolás Córdoba

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NOLY (qualifying for the team isn't enough) and WP:NGYMNAST (won no medals; participating isn't enough) Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Competed at the Olympics, in multiple events, per source 1, so easily meeting WP:NOLY. And won a gold medal at the Pan Am Games too.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Olympians are always given the presumption of being notable, especially when from non-English speaking countries. Every other athlete he competed with at the Olympics has an article.  It's not that he just qualified for the team - he competed.  The term qualification appears to be to determine qualifying to the finals - appears to be no different than heats or preliminary round in other sports.  Just how you slash the field in multiple rounds. RonSigPi (talk) 02:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep – Presumed notable per WP:NOLYMPICS, which states:"Athletes from any sport are presumed notable if they have competed at the modern Olympic Games, including the Summer Olympics (since 1896) or the Winter Olympics (since 1924)..."
 * Athletes do not have to qualify for the finals or win medals to meet this guideline. North America1000 00:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.