Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Brockie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 22:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Nicola Brockie
Not notable. Editor of a minor fashion magazine in New Zealand. Looks like self-promotion. No references. Randomkiwi 00:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. 33 Google News Archive references so seems notable enough for mine. . Capitalistroadster 00:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 00:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Lessee WP:VAIN? check. WP:BIO? nope. Delete Eusebeus 00:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Of the Google New Archive references found by CR, several are stories from the magazine Brockie edits, so they are not independent for purposes of WP:BIO. The remainder are her mentioned in passing in relation to the magazine's plans or are for quotations attributed to her discussing another topic. JChap2007 01:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom and JChap - crz crztalk 21:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per JChap2007. - Mailer Diablo 14:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.