Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Mar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr \ talk / 19:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Nicola Mar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable and promotional--I removed a good deal else, including her self-published books, in an attempt to rescue the article, but there is not enough left. The fox " article" is PR  DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * delete As a fashion model, it is WP:TOOSOON, and as an author she has pretty much nothing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * "'Keep"' This article is a true and balanced account of a well known and notable fashion model and author.50.75.215.90 (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC) — 50.75.215.90 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * IP is SPA.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep : Notable per coverage. SarahKrauch (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC) — SarahKrauch (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * New users, like SarahKrauch are welcome to learn how WP works by ivoting in AFDs.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep : Article is described accurately and fairly balanced. There seems to be correct references to back up modeling work.CathyMiller (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC) — CathyMiller (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * This new user made 5 edits in 1 day, disappeared.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: Appears to fail WP:CREATIVE as a model and as an author. The only credible source is the Fox News article and it's just a "model tells us her fave bikinis!" throwaway piece.  (Plus, the only claim sourced to it is almost certainly not true, as VS hires many models for swimwear, not just one.)     Mbinebri   talk &larr; 20:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep : Notable as seen in reliable sources quoted. She has also clearly worked with notable names in the fashion industry. Some more sources for writing work needed Waconzy (talk) 01:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC) — Waconzy (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * This user has made a total of 3 (highly unusual) edits.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete There's nothing notable about the subject, none of the sources rise to anything resembling reliability, she fails WP:GNG, nevermind anything else, and all these single-purpose accounts make me believe we're dealing with some serious paid editing issues. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.