Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Peltz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Nicola Peltz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

From Talk:Nicola Peltz: "I'dd like to nominate this article for deletion, because it's only about one sentence long and It's fairly pointless only stating that Nicola Peltz is playing Katara in the Avatar movie. This really doesn't need to be on here."

I Feel Tired (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note Opened by on 's behalf. &mdash;C45207 | Talk 00:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Has been mentioned here and there but I didn't see any substantial coverage to indicate notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If the movie is a huge hit and she becomes notable as a result then by all means we should have this article, but there's nothing there yet.--Talain (talk) 05:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The girl has a leading role in an upcoming movie based on a series with a decent sized cult following. If this article is deleted now, it's only a matter of time before someone decides to bring it back.  It makes more sense to me that this article should be expanded with pertinent information instead of being deleted.  Lostdrewid (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Peltz is very young and has credit in significant films with big budgets and a starring role yet to be released. She is also credited as a Ford Model and appears on red carpeted events with press credit. Perhaps not substantial enough now to have an article; however, very young and further credits will potentially grow. BioDetective2508 (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2009
 * Keep Article is in desperate need of expansion and sourcing, but being a stub is no reason to delete if sources exist that may aid in improvement and meeting WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.