Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola lelean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Nicola lelean
Non-notable person, see WP:BIO. The current version contains stuff like "worldwide sales for the album are now over 42mil" and "She got her first TV acting in the multi award winning film 'New Town Original', In the Oscars in early 2006" which seem to be lies. Thue | talk 22:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh piss off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlembo (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BIO and WP:V. Based on google search, looks like a wannabe with a gift for self-promotion. She's on every myspace-type site there is, and you can download a few mp3 songs of hers for free. No indication of actual notability. Fan1967 23:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, nn actress/singer with an internet conection. Eivindt@c 23:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and block User:Karlembo for oh-so-constructively blanking today's AfD page and vandalizing User:Joy Stovall's page. -- Kinu t /c  23:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment He also blanked this AfD, but I ran into it as a conflict when I was posting, so I restored Joy's AfD and comments. Fan1967 23:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, unsourced claims and an IMDB entry does not make one notable. -Dawson 23:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this looks pretty lean in and of itself, but as said by the nom, the article is full of statements which are obviously untrue. --Deville (Talk) 23:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a vanity/hoax combo. Joyous | Talk 00:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 00:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Do NOT Delete You may feel that some of the information listed on this page is unsubstantiated, however do you not feel that SOME of the information should be left on this page? The woman is certainly not in the same league as Madonna but exactly how "unfamous" do you need to be to not qualify for a wikipedia page? I mean - you've all got one. Triangle e 11:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * We don't have pages in the encyclopedia; we do have Wikipedia user pages, which is a different thing. As far as I can tell, Nicola Lelean's only accomplishment is that she has had a few minor parts in theater plays and made a few songs which have not become widely known. Anyway, if nobody removes the obviously false statements from the article the nobody is going to take it seriously. Thue | talk 15:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems to me the person being referred to is this and she's certainly not notable enough for an article on WP. Mi kk er ... 14:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and ban users. Appears to be a hoax, perpetrated by http://www.coolclarity.com/forums/index.php?s=cdfe3d3bf510dadbd08fa383aa77c58b&showtopic=68327 Dmn € &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; 01:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The user who created this page has already been banned. I hope that you are not suggesting that I am banned for defending this article. I have contributed several important articles to this site on genres of music that are criminally underrepresented. triangle e 14:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have since found out that this user, who suggested that everyone involved should be banned, was banned months ago from the site to which he is accusing of perpetrating this "hoax". Furthermore, he is registered on a rival site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triangle e (talk • contribs)
 * Comment None of which is relevant here. What is relevant is that the article on Nicola lelean contains statements that are demonstrably false, and others which totally fail any attempt to verify. What's left doesn't warrant inclusion. Fan1967 03:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The point I was making was not about his wish to delete the article but the suggestion that everyone should be banned. He wants to ban people as retribution for being banned from coolclarity.


 * Delete as per nom. ... discospinster 18:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.