Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolai Frahm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. KTC (talk) 00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Nicolai Frahm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The notability of the person has not been established since it was first nominated for deletion in April 2012. Sir Tanx (talk) 11:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

N.B. Completing nomination on behalf of user:Sir Tanx Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I could not find the previous AfD discussion. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 23:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sir Tanx is referring to a nomination for speedy deletion, which was declined, not a nomination at AfD. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- seems NN to me. I note there is no article for the family foundation (unless that has got missed by the article not beiung wikified.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has been interviewed by Forbes and has been quoted as an expert many times by reliable sources, such as The Telegraph (and again, and again, New York magazine and again, ARTnews, salon.com / AP, ArtAsiaPacific, Reuters,Financial Times, and Bloomberg. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep has decent coverage in the content above, the article just needs improvement. Seems to be a respected figure in the art sales world (respected doesn't mean notability..but, in this case they seem to garner a lot of attention for their knowledge which appears to be notable based on the media coverage!). SarahStierch (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- only trivial mentions as stand-in art expert. CaptainPrimo (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jay Jay What did I do? 23:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I ment to relist this today so that is why the date is wrong  Jay Jay What did I do? 01:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I am to some extent persuded by the citations above. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.