Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole (Chilean singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 23:06, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Nicole (Chilean singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As here and there is no enough references showing notability Ladsgroupبحث 03:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — —Tom Morris (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions.  — —Tom Morris (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Artist is notable in Chile. That the article has no references it should have been solved by adding a tag, but certainly not AfD. A quick Google search shows lots of coverage on the artist. Despite Mr. Cantillano's status on other wikis, and his mass-creation of Nicole articles, shouldn't influence this AfD at all.  Diego  talk 03:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BAND. LiteralKa (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No, she doesn't. There are enough references which prove her notable, including this one from the Chilean National Council of Culture.  Diego  talk 21:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, you've found one citation. Congrats! LiteralKa (talk) 21:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of other sources which discuss her in detail, just click that link to Google search. Plus, this AfD was made in the grounds of "spamming" by certain user, not on their notability, which you're contesting.  Diego  talk 21:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Did you even read the nom? "and there is no enough references showing notability" LiteralKa (talk) 22:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Crap, I'm being trolled by a moron. *Fucks off*  Diego  talk 22:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * How many times do I have to caution you about being civil? LiteralKa (talk) 22:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep There is biography info and references to her in random spots on the internet, such as here. snaphat (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment random spots on the Internet, really?
 * by random spots, I simply mean if you do a google search and go through the pages you will find multiple references. I listed one such source. There may not be lots of sources, but there is certainly enough. snaphat (talk) 00:41, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Again, I didn't see any significant coverage. LiteralKa (talk) 00:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is some of the stuff I found: here, here , here, here, here , here, and here. I'm apologize that my post looks horrible when displayed, I do not mean it to, but I don not want to go through and write the names though for each link :-/. Some of the stuff I found linked on a non-english version of wikipedia. snaphat (talk) 00:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Of those, only this and this don't immediately fail WP:RS (sans the last two as they are hidden behind paywalls) after a quick glance at them. LiteralKa (talk) 01:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops, a few of those were based off of Wikipedia. Marking those out. what exactly is wrong the non-marked out ones that makes them fail WP:RS? snaphat (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. You agree with me regarding the non-marked out sources that can be accessed. The two behind a pay-wall also look legit from what I can see of them. I wonder if I can get a better view. snaphat (talk) 01:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I found what appears to be a summary or copy of the first paywall article here. The second one appears to be talk about sale failures for a particular album. snaphat (talk) 01:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * So to some up so far - if we take the non-paywall references here and the reference already on the article page we have 3 references that do not fail WP:RS. We have information about one of the paywall articles and it appears to be okay. And the other paywall article appears to be specifically about her, but we can't see the contents. snaphat (talk) 01:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually I was wrong, there are 4 references that do not fail WP:RS (not including the paywall articles) if we include the two I found, the one already on the article, and the one Diego showed. snaphat (talk) 03:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Plenty of independent reliable sources with significant coverage can be found by using |+%22Esperando+nada%22+|+%22Sue%C3%B1os+en+tr%C3%A1nsito%22+|+%22Viaje+infinito%22%29&btnG=Search+Archives&num=100&scoring=a the obvious search arguments at Google News. There's also some coverage in Billboard: |+%22Esperando+nada%22+|+%22Sue%C3%B1os+en+tr%C3%A1nsito%22+|+%22Viaje+infinito%22%29&hl=en&ei=nOUxTriBK4WUOoqiseQL&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Nicole%22%20%28%22Tal%20vez%20me%20estoy%20enamorando%22%20|%20%22Esperando%20nada%22%20|%20%22Sue%C3%B1os%20en%20tr%C3%A1nsito%22%20|%20%22Viaje%20infinito%22%29&f=false|+%22Esperando+nada%22+|+%22Sue%C3%B1os+en+tr%C3%A1nsito%22+|+%22Viaje+infinito%22%29&hl=en&ei=nOUxTriBK4WUOoqiseQL&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Nicole%22%20%28%22Tal%20vez%20me%20estoy%20enamorando%22%20|%20%22Esperando%20nada%22%20|%20%22Sue%C3%B1os%20en%20tr%C3%A1nsito%22%20|%20%22Viaje%20infinito%22%29&f=false. Any concerns with editor behaviour can be dealt with by the processes that we have for behavioural issues, but should also consider the behaviour of those who are too quick to classify good-faith, constructive additions to Wikipedia as vandalism. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.