Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Dal Santo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:47, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Nicole Dal Santo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination for an IP editor, whose rationale (from the article's talk page) is copied verbatim below. On the merits, I make no recommendation. Note, however, that even if the one reference provided is reliable, it's not enough on its own to show notability. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

This article is only a list of statistics. There is nothing that indicates that this cyclist is special or important in any shape or form. The only source is a dubious website that gives no info about its owners and that has no indication of any serious review(it isn't reliable).2003:69:AD03:BF00:E41C:AB6C:2292:74D1 (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, how do you know about the AfD process, since you're a new editor? Have you edited before, and if so, under what account(s)?  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep A quick search found several articles about the subject, which I've added to the article, alongside her already meeting the notability for being a professional cyclist. At worst, redirect to her cycling team.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. IP should have practiced WP:BEFORE. Improvements by Lugnuts meet WP:GNG. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 18:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep thanks for making some initial improvements and . Article could use expansion not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 21:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. Fails WP:GNG. Coverage is limited to the usual stat agregators, and WP:NCYC for women is broken and super-inclusive, so from the sport perspective she fails. There seem to be some coverage of her as a model both those sites don't look very reliable; I'd like to hear from an Italian speaker on their reliability. The problem with this low-level celebrity coverage is that sometimes such sites are gossip-tabloid-blog level of sources, and our standards are a bit higher. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the improvements made by Lugnuts. Lepricavark (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NCYC after the improvements made by Lugnuts. Smartyllama (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.