Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NicoustiE

NicoustiE was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Not notable. --fvw *  23:19, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete this. This shouldn't even be up for discussion. - Lucky 6.9 23:20, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Feel free to change policy, but until then this is not a CSD.  --fvw *  23:21, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
 * I thought I asked you to stop the personal attacks. - Lucky 6.9 23:28, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, point 4, "little or no content" Dbenbenn 23:47, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * actually, point 4 says: very short articles with little or no conteXt. in this case, some (maybe little) context is provided by the wikilinks. but delete anyway. Michael Ward 06:19, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oops. Thanks for pointing that out.  Dbenbenn 18:43, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * "Szyslak is an American Simpsons watcher." Sorry, I couldn't resist. Speedy delete. --Szyslak 03:22, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * keep and expand this substub (szyslak, not nicoustie) Michael Ward 06:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete.-gadfium (talk) 06:13, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Apparently speedied, from the delete log: 07:45, 21 Dec 2004 Neutrality deleted NicoustiE (content was: 'A Finnish Counter-Strike player.Founder of NAMC')
 * Admins, if you speedy something that is listed on VFD, would you please be so kind as to stop by and state your rationale. User:fvw has objected that this is not a CSD, and it would be good form to respect that objection with a brief explanation.  Particularly so, as this would appear to be a judgement call. Respectfully, Michael Ward 17:56, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletes are always supposed to be non-controversial. Since this one was contested, it must suffer the full time on VfD.  Temporarily restored to allow VfD to continue.  (My vote, by the way, is regular delete as vanity.)  Rossami (talk) 05:24, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've just noted elsewhere (VfD:NAMC) that a number of editors have placed speedy and delete tags on the same article at the same time; this does create the possibility to complicate matters. Only one should be used (speedy if relevant, changing to delete if discussion ensues) but when something has been listed by others and there is no comment (at that time) then I believe we should trust admins to make an informed decision along the lines of the rules but also making use of their experience when appropriate and sensible to do so. --Vamp:Willow 18:48, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have speedied it.  Equivalent to "has created Factory and the Hacienda."  SWAdair | Talk  09:11, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.