Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nidia Rivera Lopez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Nidia Rivera Lopez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

City councilwoman. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. The only reliable source coverage is in the local newspaper. Most of that is focused on the election and a false accusation of having her primary residence in another state. Rusf10 (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete contrary to what editors seem to think, not every city council member in every city in New Jersey is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete this search on her name in The Star Ledger the major regional daily in this area, with three routine hits confirms non-notability, although some council member in a city this large (quarter million) could pass POLITICIAN.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. City councillors are not automatically presumed notable under WP:NPOL — we accept the city councillors of major metropolitan global cities, but outside of that rarefied class of megalopoli the only other path for a city councillor to get into Wikipedia at all is to show a depth and range and volume of coverage that plainly marks her out as significantly more notable than most other city councillors. But every city councillor in existence could always show as many purely local sources as are shown here, so that's not enough. Bearcat (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.