Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Golden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Nigel Golden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Outstanding PhD student, but still too soon for Wikipedia page. Eostrix (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * "Too soon" is not a valid reason for deletion. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * He does not at present meet GNG nor Notability (academics).--Eostrix (talk) 16:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient evidence of notability provided in the current version of the article. ElKevbo (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Far WP:Too soon for even a remote pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC).
 * Delete. Far from WP:PROF and the media coverage of research on which he was a junior partner doesn't rise above WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.