Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigger6

Haha, that's not really a freeipods link. Check it out. (no-one wants to see that page. Link removed. &#8212;Rory &#9786; 13:31, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC))
 * Why should this be deleted? It's perfectly legit. Nobody here has heard of Nigger6? 68.105.147.66 07:34, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * No I haven't, check out my comments on talk:Nigger6. And please register, it makes conversations easier when you have a name rather than just an IP.--MaxMad 07:39, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Someone beat me to this page again. Anyway, sounds so much like a hoax. A Google Test fails (and no, SafeSearch isn't on). Two anons are edit warring over who can put more FreeIpods links into the article. Get rid of it. --Slowking Man 07:37, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 07:53, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * One of the vandals put that link in there, not the original author.
 * If we can't verify, delete. May qualift as patent nonsense speedy. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 08:21, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, as long as we can get any verification. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:13, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Not quite patent nonsense. But definitely delete. &mdash; David Remahl 08:49, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Right on the edge of nonsense, definite hoaxing. Geogre 13:16, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ridiculous, silly, and outright offensive nonsense! -- Crevaner 16:00, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg 17:22, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I happen to myself have a little knowledge of the Nigger6 program that I cannot speak about. Please do not delete the article. (Unsigned, by Special:Contributions/130.166.170.209)
 * There are many articles on Wikipedia devoted to conspiracy theories, and dismissing this as not wiki worthy simply because the organization isn't well known or can be construed to have an offensive name (remember, this is a Norwegian organization, so Nigger may very well be a coincidence) is no grounds for deletion. Please consider this when voting. 68.105.147.66 03:57, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * This is not a coincidence. "Nigger" means exactly the same in Norwegian. Actually it may be more offensive, since the number 6 is pronounced "sex". Delete as nonsense.--MaxMad 09:31, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but it needs to be completed. There was a lot of Israeli involvement in the espionage that has gone undiscussed in the article SoulJuice 04:03, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Note: this vote is User:SoulJuice's second contribution (adding this to his userpage was his first.) --Ardonik.talk 19:28, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * I've never heard of this but it certianly seems extremely well-researched...it's definately worth keeping in, if at least for "strange" information value - it's one of those things that is probably impossible to truly confirm or deny. (Unsigned, by Special:Contributions/70.240.80.252)
 * While I cannot discuss it in depth, I would like to mention that this conspiracy is very real, and that those who are attempting to dispute its encyclopediac value ought to read the comprehensive sections in the corrospondance between Leib and "Nameless patriot" which I believe was published as a yellow staple-bound dossier. I'll have to look through my archives to see what company published these. (Unsigned, by Special:Contributions/68.209.144.61)


 * Delete. Zero Google hits in English, only three altogether, all in German, and I'm not sure those are about this.  Hoax.  RickK 06:12, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Maybe there are no Google results because Israelis working for Google censored them.
 * Okay, this is honestly degenerating into insanity. Go push your anti-Israel POV somewhere else. --Slowking Man 06:25, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Tin-foil hat stuff. Andrewa 06:36, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  14:36, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ridiculous hoax.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 16:44, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. &#8212;Rory &#9786; 15:39, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've heard of it before.--Lysol 21:18, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: this user is associated with GNAA and has vandalized Wikipedia articles in the past. --Ardonik.talk 19:37, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely more to this story than meets the eye -- GNAA Popeye 21:22, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: this user is associated with GNAA and has vandalized the wikipedia in the past, blanking his or her user talk page when confronted over this. --Ardonik.talk 19:37, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * That wasn't me, somebody hacked my account GNAA Popeye 19:39, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think I heard about this before. Definately something worth keeping and exploring further. It can't hurt to keep it. --Dirtytroll 21:29, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * (The above user has only two edits - possible sock puppet) - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  21:32, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. Antandrus 02:45, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Scam. - Nunh-huh 02:47, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete this patent nonsense with prejudice, possibly banning the sockpuppets that have come out in support of this article. A Google returns only Wikipedia and http://weblog.disgu.st/ (NOT WORK SAFE), proudly stating that it's an "official sponsor of  Nigger6" and linking back here.  We're being had by trolls that get their jollies by wasting our time instead of making positive contributions to our work.    --Ardonik.talk 19:21, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - patent nonsense only defended by vandalism and insults andy 19:58, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * DeleteGeni 20:01, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, for no reason other than that something sock puppets and trolls want to keep this badly can't be real. func(talk) 01:55, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Just because I want to see what all these sockpuppets will do to me ;).  &mdash;  Il&gamma;&alpha;&eta;&epsilon;&rho;   (T&alpha;l&kappa;)  02:22, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Here's what they did to User:Ardonik. I'm disappointed; they're really not very good.  --Ardonik.talk 04:10, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * I would know, I got to revert it ;)  &mdash;  Il&gamma;&alpha;&eta;&epsilon;&rho;   (T&alpha;l&kappa;)  12:57, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete fiction, ban vandals. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:39, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

DELETED


 * See? I told you guys it was nonsense.  --Ardonik.talk 18:10, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)