Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night Agency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. promotion for non-notable company Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Night Agency

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable and promotional. Eve the AdvertisingAge article is a slightly disguised press release; the awards are localor regional, not notational. Lack of notability is not the only reason for deletion. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason. Small variations to the notability standard either way do not fundamentally harm the encycopedia, but accepting articles that are part of a promotional campaign causes great damage. Once we become a vehicle for promotion, we're useless as an encyclopedia  DGG ( talk ) 15:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches have found a few other links but still nothing solidly convincing, the article shows no other signs this could have convincing improvements with my searches finding noting better aside from a few links. Notifying 2013 PRODer . SwisterTwister   talk  19:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.